U.S. housing market still bears nasty scars years after crisis

Share of mortgages in negative equity has been halved in almost four years, but it's a long way from healthy

By Bloomberg News

Jun 12, 2015 @ 12:16 pm EST

It's the one statistic that keeps Stan Humphries up at night.

A decade after U.S. home sales peaked, 15.4% of owners in the first quarter owed more on their mortgages than their properties were worth, according to a report Friday by Zillow Inc. While that's down from a high of 31.4% in 2012, it's still alarmingly above the 1% or 2% that marks a healthy market, said Mr. Humphries, the chief economist at the Seattle-based real-estate data provider. Worse yet: The pace of healing is losing steam.

The blotch stains the economy by restraining the housing recovery and by preventing the job market from becoming even more vigorous. It also will probably exacerbate wealth inequality for years to come as homes valued in the bottom third of the market are more likely to be underwater.

“There's a large swath of the housing market which could become quite static, which creates real long-term problems,” Mr. Humphries said.

The share of mortgage borrowers underwater in the first quarter was down 3.4 percentage points from 18.8% at the same time last year, according to the Zillow data. That's a marked slowdown in the pace of improvement from the 6.6-point drop in the 12 months through March 2014. Just over half the owners were 20% or more away from breaking even.

The problem “was kind of on a glide-slope to fade away and it's now circling the airport,” said Mr. Humphries.


While the healthiest way for the underwater mortgages to heal is through home-price appreciation, those increases are diminishing. Residential property values nationally rose 4.14% in March from the prior year, according to the S&P;/Case-Shiller index. The gauge has decelerated each month since the end of 2013, when it climbed 10.8%.

“I expect a more moderate pace of home-price appreciation,” said Greg McBride, senior financial analyst for Bankrate Inc. in North Palm Beach, Florida. Therefore, the progress in rebuilding home equity “is unlikely to come as quickly in the next three years as it has in the last three.”

The prospect of having so many properties lingering underwater, probably for another five or six years, is what unsettles Mr. Humphries.

“The problem you could be creating is 15% to 20% of the housing stock becomes non-tradeable, which means inventory shortages continue, prices remain very spiky because liquidity is thin, and foreclosures remain very high,” he said.


People with no equity in their homes also have little spending power to renovate them, devaluing the stock further, according to Nicolas Retsinas, director emeritus of Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies in Cambridge, Mass., and a member of the board of directors at Freddie Mac.

Additionally, homeowners might hesitate to move until they have at least 20% equity in their homes in order to have enough cash for a down payment on a new property, crimping mobility.

With more Americans staying put, the labor market and broader economy also suffer from less vitality, said Mr. Retsinas.

“It tethers people to their homes so it reduces the labor mobility that's important in a healthy, growing economy,” he said. Underwater mortgages are “one more pothole.”


The scars aren't lost on policy makers. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, in a May 22 speech in Rhode Island, put underwater properties first in listing “a number of economic headwinds that have slowed the recovery.”

While the central bank chief sees slow and steady easing of underwater properties as home prices and credit availability increase, it remains a strain.

“I would score this headwind as still a concern, but one that is likely to continue to fade,” she said.


A lack of equity also reinforces income and wealth disparities because owners of less-expensive properties are more often in the hole. While 25.5% of homes valued in the lowest third are underwater, just 14.1% of those in the middle have negative equity. For the top group, the figure is even lower — 8.3%.

“This is the tale of two countries,” said Julia Gordon, director of housing finance and policy at the Center for American Progress, a Washington advocacy group closely aligned with the Obama administration.

“In one country, you have this depression in the housing market,” said Ms. Gordon. “There's no reason for people to move there, so you can't either fix the negative equity or fix the growth problem.”

Conversely, “in the places where there are opportunities, housing is insanely unaffordable — both homeownership and rental,” she said.

Among the 50 largest metropolitan statistical areas in the Zillow data, San Jose, Calif., had the smallest share of negative equity, at 3.8%, and San Francisco and Buffalo, N.Y., each showed 6.1%. Las Vegas and Virginia Beach, Va., had the highest, at 25%.

San Jose and San Francisco also ranked first and second on Zillow's list of the highest monthly rents in 2014. San Francisco showed the biggest appreciation in home prices in the year ended March, S&P;/Case-Shiller data show.

“Negative equity doesn't get discussed as much because we don't see people getting thrown out of their homes by sheriffs and foreclosure auctions anymore, or as much,” said Zillow's Mr. Humphries. “That'll be heating up again as a topic. It's not getting better.”

Join the Discussion

Most Popular

Affluence Influencers

// load addthis social plugin // responsive video resize